ZAMBIAN COURT REJECTS THE OPPOSITION BID TO BLOCK LUNGU'S INAUGURATION
Zambia court rejects
opposition bid to block Lungu's inauguration
Zambia's President Edgar Lungu attends a signing ceremony at the
Elysee Palace in Paris, France, February 8, 2016. REUTERS/Philippe Wojazer/File Photo
Zambia's Supreme Court has rejected an application by the main
opposition party to stop President Edgar Lungu's inauguration, set for Tuesday
after last month's contested election, a lawyer for the opposition leader said
on Monday.
The election row - which followed violence
between rival campaign supporters in what is otherwise considered one of
Africa's most stable democracies - could damage Zambia's ability to attract
investment critical to reviving the economy.
"The court has declined to grant the
application on grounds that as a single judge he has no jurisdiction,"
Keith Mweemba, a lawyer for opposition leader Hakainde Hichilema told
journalists.
Lungu's inauguration after the Aug. 11
election was postponed because Hichilema challenged the result in court, saying
the vote was rigged. A law introduced in January says the winner of a
presidential vote cannot be sworn in if their victory is contested in court.
On Friday the Lusaka High Court threw out an
attempt by Opposition United Party for National Development (UPND) leader
Hichilema to overturn a Constitutional Court decision not to give him more time
to legally challenge Lungu's re-election.
Mweemba said his clients planned to file
another application before the full bench of the Supreme Court.
Zambia will press on with swearing in its
president for another five-year-term on Tuesday after Lungu won 50.35 percent
of the vote according to the official results.
Prospects for resuming critical budget support
talks with the International Monetary Fund have been dimmed by delays in
swearing in a new head of state.
Lungu has been the head of the ruling
Patriotic Front since its leader, Michael Sata, died in 2014. He won the
presidency the following year, defeating Hichilema in their first electoral
confrontation.
In a separate ruling, the broadcasting regulator
lifted the suspension of Muvi TV, the nation's largest private television
station after the station admitted to producing "unfair and unbalanced
content" during the election period.
In August the Independent Broadcasting
Authority (IBA) suspended the licenses of three private broadcasters, saying
they had conducted themselves in an "unprofessional manner" during
and after the election. The IBA said the station's coverage "posed a risk
to national peace and stability, but gave no details.
READ MORE
Hichilema Takes Presidential Petition To The High
Court
Losing presidential
candidate Hakainde Hichilema says his party will go to the High Court over
their dismissed petition before the Constitutional Court.
Speaking to the BBC’s
Akwesi Sampong on the Focus on Africa programme, Hichilema said the scheduled
inauguration next Tuesday was illegal.
The UPND leader who
saw his spirited court challenge against the election of President Edgar Lungu
said the UPND petition was dismissed by three mischievous judges in apparent
reference to the trio that did not vote in his favour.
Asked one what action
his party will do Hichilema responded: “That is illegal (inauguration) it is
against the constitution because we have not been heard. We are going to the
High Court because as you may know in the so called ruling today, the president
of the Constitutional Court objected to what the three judges did. She not
alone, another judge Munalula also dismissed it that was mischievous.”
He added: “The point
is the president of the Constitutional Court has ridiculed what they tried to do
today and she was not alone.”
Asked on the futility of his decision since the Constitutional
Court decisions were not appealable he said: “The right to be heard is part of
the Bill of Rights and because of the different interpretation of this 14 days
hearing, and not determination the High Court has the jurisdiction to interpret
that our fundamental right to be heart has been violated. The petition was not
heard, they decided without being heard. It is like a murder accused today is
sentenced today without being charged. That is what has happened today.”
Hichilema said the
Constitutional Court was in a confused state having made several conflicting
rulings during the hearing.
“The court is in a
confused state, they basically put us in a constitutional crisis. By the way
two days ago, a full bench of judges of the Constitutional Court ruled that the
petition will commence on Monday (Today) and will run up to Thursday,”
he said.
“The full bench of
five judges ruled and then today we go to court, three judges appear in court
and indicate that they have changed their minds and they have a contrary ruling
and they are the majority. They cannot be the majority because the full bench on
Friday and ruled that the petition commences today. The petition has
already commenced, we have not been heard, and we have been denied the right to
be heard.”
He said that the court should have shown
direction over the conflict on the 14 days threshold that finally undid his
court challenge.
Comments
Post a Comment